Updated July 4, 2020 – As of June 28 the total number of positive tests for COVID-19 in the 6 Bay Area counties reached 22,566. The 6-County daily rate of change was 2.01% (It’s been between 2.89% and 1.06% since June 14 – we’re starting to trend in the wrong direction). See the line chart (third chart).
I recently attended the annual meeting of the AMC Institute in Long Beach, CA. For a west coast venue, there was good turn out and Long Beach Convention and Visitors’ Bureau rolled out the red carpet.
There was a program this year that resurrected an old topic: “Trusted Development as a Client Partnership Strategy” presented by Michael Reed of Bloch and Reed (Association Advisors). Bloch and Reed is not an AMC, so in defining their role with clients as a “trusted partner”, I have no issue. I continue to have an issue defining the AMC-Client relationship as a “partnership” for the same reasons I did back in April 2009 when I first posted on this topic. (“AMCs More Like Agents Than Partners”)
I’m not afraid to admit when I’m wrong. I’ve been on the wrong side of an important association board practice for many years.
Because I had the good fortune to work with two exceptional board leaders and clients – Harry Mason with the SCSI Trade Association (STA), and Marlis Humphrey with the former Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) Forum – I saw that each organization would be denied Harry’s and Marlis’s talents as board leaders if term limits had been in effect.
L&M concludes a highly successful six-year engagement providing executive management to the California Association of Flower Growers & Shippers (CalFlowers). It’s been an honor and privilege to serve the CalFlowers board of directors and membership. We are grateful for the new friends we made and to have learned about the fascinating cut flower industry.
This paper reports the results of a study examining the rates of change in the length of chief staff executive tenure and of turnover in office locations of membership-based organizations for the period 2009 to 2015. The study sample was 396 randomly selected associations from 9 of the most populous states and the District of Columbia.
The results of each case were surprising. They revealed much higher frequency of turnover in standalone organizations compared to organizations managed by Association Management Companies (AMCs). As the chart above shows, standalone organizations changed their chief staff executives more than 10-times more often than AMC-managed organizations. This study may finally reveal evidence explaining why AMC-managed organizations outperform standalone organizations in key performance indicators. Download full report.
SAN FRANCISCO – Feb. 20, 2019 – PRLog — LoBue and Majdalany Association Management (L&M) has been awarded its fifth accreditation by the AMC Institute, the global trade association representing the Association Management industry.
Only 81 of more than 500 Association Management Companies (AMCs) worldwide have achieved AMC Institute Accreditation, demonstrating the commitment and ability to deliver the highest level of professional management services to associations and not-for-profit organization (NPO) clients. These AMCs are the recognized choice of associations and NPOs.
A timeline is a common tool used to orient boards of directors to their unique responsibilities.
When we conduct board orientations, we characterize the organization’s next 12 months as belonging to the chief staff officer, also known as the executive director. Once the board has approved a plan, priorities, and a budget, it is up to the chief staff officer and his or her staff to execute it.
The results are in: The AMC management model generated more consistent operating surpluses and grew reserves to a greater extent between 2006 and 2015 than did the non-AMC model (i.e., directly employed staff and full financial responsibility for occupancy and capital costs).
Read the full report here.
For those familiar with the AMC model, this is not a big surprise. What is newsworthy about the results is that we have credible evidence that demonstrates the advantages of the AMC model for associations. These results add to previous studies conducted in the past decade showing that the AMC model is both the less expensive alternative to hiring staff directly and shouldering all operational costs, including capital purchases, and also the more productive association management model.
In short, the non-AMC model is overpriced and under-performing.
These latest results lead to an interesting set of questions: Why does the AMC model outperform the non-AMC-model? What’s the AMC model’s ‘secret-sauce”?
To be certain – everyone is in a jar or two. Association executives are in the “association” jar, or the “management” jar. We can’t help our orientation and our perspective. However, we can make sure that our perspectives are not our greatest liabilities.
There are two components to the AMC-model that delivers the performance and value for organizations: economies of scale; and economies of scope. The AMC value proposition is strongest when these are combined.
The first, economies of scale, is self-explanatory. It’s the sharing of certain infrastructure and operational costs across numerous client organizations. Such costs include: